Create a short review template
Use the same questions each time: What was the original reasoning? Did the information support the selection? Did you follow your planned pick size and challenge rules? What would you verify next time?
A fixed template keeps the review focused on decisions and avoids rewriting your rationale after the result is known.
Look for recurring decisions, not dramatic stories
One unusual event can be memorable without revealing a pattern. Review a meaningful group of predictions and identify repeated behaviors, such as incomplete research, rushed selections, or inconsistent sizing.
The most useful adjustment is often specific and modest: add a source check, establish a cutoff time, or require a written reason before recording a pick.
Keep the review tied to the published framework
If you are participating in a challenge, compare your activity with the current written rules as well as your own process. This includes pick requirements, sizing limits, and inactivity expectations.
Use official rule pages for the current terms. An educational review routine supports skill measurement, but it does not guarantee challenge completion, review approval, or rewards.